Saturday, March 31, 2012

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL


INSTITUCIONAL SOURCE

AIR UNIVERSITY
THE INTELECTUAL AND LEADERSHIP CENTER OF THE AIR FORCE

1996
 BIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL
« One can envision the development of electromagnetic energy sources, the output of which can be pulsed, shaped, and focused, that can couple with the human body in a fashion that will allow one to prevent voluntary muscular movements, control emotions (and thus actions), produce sleep, transmit suggestions, interfere with both short-term and long-term memory, produce an experience set, and delete an experience set.»

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/vistas/ancillary.pdf




PERCEPTION

«Human Network Attacks (local copy), FMSO study (see especially section titled "Reflexive Control: an Information Weapon Subset")

"In military actions, attacking minds_that is the primary mission; attacking fortifications, that is a secondary mission. Psychological war is the main thing. Combat is secondary." — Third Century Chinese Military Theoretician
    • Russian military theorist S.A. Komov has written that RC [reflexive control] is a form of "intellectual" IW. He offered the following eleven types of intellectual IW for use against systems, people, alliances or forces in the field:
      • Distraction—during preparatory stages of combat operations, creating a real or imaginary threat against one of the most vital enemy places such as flanks and rear, forcing him to reevaluate his decisions to operate on this or that axis.
      • Overload—often manifested by sending the enemy a large amount of conflicting information.
      • Paralysis—creating the belief of a specific threat to a vital interest or weak spot.
      • Exhaustion—cause the enemy to carry out useless operations, thereby entering combat with expended resources.
      • Deception—during preparatory stages of combat operations, force the enemy to reallocate forces to a threatened spot.
      • Divisive techniques—cause the enemy to believe he must operate in opposition to coalition interests.
      • Pacification—through a peaceful attitude and approach cause the enemy to lose vigilance.
      • Deterrence—create the impression of superiority.
      • Provocation—force enemy action advantageous to your side.
      • Suggestion—offer information that affects the enemy legally, morally, ideologically or in other areas.
      • Pressure—offer information that encourages society to discredit its own government. »


1998
 «The Mind Has No Firewall, by Thomas, in Parameters, Spring 1998
An entirely new arsenal of weapons, based on devices designed to introduce subliminal messages or to alter the body's psychological and data-processing capabilities, might be used to incapacitate individuals. These weapons aim to control or alter the psyche, or to attack the various sensory and data-processing systems of the human organism. In both cases, the goal is to confuse or destroy the signals that normally keep the body in equilibrium.»


Saturday, January 28, 2012

No Lethal Weapons/ Armas Não Letais



SCIENCE - MICROWAVE AUDITORY EFFECT (MAE) OR THE FREY EFFECT
EFFECT - SILENT SOUND
EAR RECOGNIZABLE SOUNDS IN HEAD (High Power Use) / MIGHT ABLE TO SUBCONSCIOUS INFLUENCE* (Low Power Use)

 (Some Highlights)

TIMELINE  - Click effect reported since World War II

INSTITUTIONAL SOURCE

COLD WAR (1962) - AMERICAN PHYSIOLOGICAL SOCIETY 
NEUROSCIENTIST ALLAN H. FREY discovered the  Microwave Audio Effect - «Human auditory system response to modulated electromagnetic energy» http://jap.physiology.org/content/17/4/689.abstract?sid=7c073ad2-6324-4b47-94e1-124dc0a5f154 



2003/2004 - US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
«Navy Search Database – Summary Report Contract M67854-04-C-1012 I phase "Remote Personnel Incapacitation System" …design and build a breadboard prototype of a temporary personnel incapacitation system called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio). This non lethal weapon is base on the well established microwave auditory effect (MAE).(...)the system will be portable,..., be able to switch from crowd to individual coverage...» [the underline is mine] http://navysbirprogram.com/NAvySearch/Summary/summary.aspx?pk=F5B07D


25 MARCH, 2004 - FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS
«Nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device which uses microwave transmission of sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device which can transmit sound into the skull of person or animals. NOTE: The sound modulation may be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of V2K is use as an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.» [The underline is mine] http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html


MEDIA

21 MARCH, 2008 - NEW SCIENTIST
"US Army toyed with telepathic ray gun"
«The report titled "Bioeffects Of Selected Nonlethal Weapons" was released under the US Freedom of Information Act and is available on this website (pdf). The DoD has confirmed to New Scientist that it released the documents, which detail five different "maturing non-lethal technologies" using microwaves, lasers and sound.
Released by US Army Intelligence and Command at Fort Meade, Maryland, US, the 1998 report gives an overview of what was then the state of the art in directed energy weapons for crowd control and other applications.» [The Underline is mine] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13513-us-army-toyed-with-telepathic-ray-gun.html

3 JULY, 2008 - NEW SCIENTIST
"Microwave Ray Gun Controls Crowds with Noise"
«A US company claims it is ready to build a microwave ray gun able to beam sounds directly into people's heads. The device dubbed MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) exploits the microwave audio effect, in which short microwave pulses rapidly heat tissus, causing a shockwave inside the skull that can be detected by the ears. A series of pulses can be transmitted to produce recognisable sounds. The device is aimed for military or crowd-control applications, but may have other uses.  (...)You might see neural damage"» «Sierra Nevada says that a demonstration version could be built in a year, with a transportable system following within 18 months. They are currently seeking funding for the work from the US Department of Defence. [The underline is mine]. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14250-microwave-ray-gun-controls-crowds-with-noise.html
 

4 JULY, 2008 - ABC NEWS
"Microwave Ray Gun Controls Crowds with Noise"


6 JULY, 2008 - WIRED
"The Microwave Scream inside your Skull"
«...it might be used at low power to produce a whisper that was too quiet to perceive consciously but might be able to subconsciously influence someone» [The underline is mine] http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2008/07/the-microwave-s/



*About subliminar influence proved


MEDIA

27 DECEMBER, 2007 - SCIENCE DAILY
"Subliminal Messages Can Influence People In Surprising Ways"
«Further, the researchers say that their studies indicate that, in general, subliminal messages -- that is, messages that are processed by our brains but never reach our consciousness -- do indeed influence explicit attitudes and real-life political behavior, a significant extension to what we know about the effects of non-conscious processes.The studies, led by cognitive scientist Dr. Ran Hassin of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Psychology Department, show that the subliminal presentation of a national symbol affects not only political attitudes, but also voting intentions and actual voting in general elections.» [The underline is mine] http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/12/071227183859.htm


28 SEPTEMBER, 2009 - UCL INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
"UCL study: subliminal messaging ‘more effective when negative’"
«Previous studies have already hinted that people can unconsciously pick up on subliminal information intended to provoke an emotional response, but limitations in the design of the studies have meant that the conclusions were ambiguous.
Today the journal Emotion publishes a study led by Professor Nilli Lavie (UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience), which provides evidence that people are able to process emotional information from subliminal images and demonstrates conclusively that even under such conditions, information of negative value is better detected than information of positive value.» [The underline is mine] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0909/09092801